Giant mergers and acquisitions monopoly boundary variables continue to be based on standards into th mkdv-02

Giant mergers and acquisitions monopoly boundary variables continuously according to the standard game of stakeholders into monopoly boundary problem giant mergers and acquisitions because of policy changes, commercial law, law enforcement means, limitation of elasticity and other uncertain factors, coupled with the Internet industry’s few cases to follow precedent, where monopoly boundary, full of variables – Print journalist Xiao Huilong Cai Tingyiwen editor’s note Xinye: under the state of Internet companies to seize the emerging markets, and that the most favorable industry dominant position, not open around a melee competitors within the same industry. Whether it is the five largest Internet merger last year, or the year trip with UBER (China) by merger, in close up when fighting capital talks to merge the same. Although these companies in the market to break the traditional pattern of repeated construction of new power level, but want to expand the market "cake" scale is still not easy, the process will not only have competitors of the contest, sometimes need to cross many barriers of antitrust review. The game between the capital market and the regulation is everywhere, but in most cases, the resistance or the threshold of the merger will be one by one. UBER (Chinese) drops travel and merger seems more complicated, is now "review ridden centralized" operators, has thus become the implementation of "anti monopoly law", law enforcement authorities continued to publicly expressed concern, not the declaration to complete the merger of the first Internet market merger. Due to a variety of uncertainties, such as policy changes, commercial means, the limitations of law, law enforcement flexibility and other factors, coupled with the Internet industry rarely follow precedent cases, monopoly boundaries where, full of variables. In September 2nd, the Ministry of Commerce spokesman Shen Danyang third drops travel (hereinafter referred to as UBER (China) drops) and combined to respond, and the first clear, according to the Ministry of commerce is the "anti-monopoly law" and the "State Council on the standard for declaration of concentration of business operators provisions", "Declaration of concentration of business operators approach" and other laws and regulations, investigating the the merger, the merging party fails to declare that required centralized reasons, introduced transactions and network about the car operation mode and competitive conditions in the relevant market. The Internet market competition increasingly fierce, involving monopoly and unfair competition disputes and cases increased year by year, similar to the Internet enterprise merger, often lead to public opinion on whether there is a monopoly problem. Analysis of data from Thomson Reuters analyst Elaine Tan senior research to provide the "financial" reporters show the implementation of China Internet field in recent years, more frequent merger. As of September 23rd this year, BAT has announced a total of 23 cases of mergers and acquisitions, amounting to $207 million 929 thousand. The number of mergers and acquisitions cases announced in 2015 up to 61 BAT, the total transaction of $302 million 769 thousand. In 2015, travel and drops fast taxi, 58 city and Ganji, Ctrip and where the network, the U.S. group and public comment, Jiayuan and Lily network and other Internet companies merger did not accept business concentration review, although some of them have been associated with antitrust reporting. For the merger of enterprises need to focus on the review? Whether theory相关的主题文章: